The Michael biopic opens April 24 tracking $55–80M domestically, which would beat Bohemian Rhapsody's $51M record for the biggest music biopic opening ever. The campaign has been running for several months and has accumulated a string of genuinely unusual tactics. Before breaking down why they worked, it is worth saying clearly: most of what Lionsgate did here would not work for another artist. The campaign is only legible because of who it is about.

Michael Jackson had 60 million monthly Spotify listeners at the time of his death in 2009. That number has barely moved. He is not a legacy artist in the way most deceased musicians become legacy artists, which is to say fondly remembered by a narrowing demographic. He is an active cultural presence for audiences across four or five generations simultaneously, which is essentially unprecedented in popular music. The campaign did not create this. It channeled it. That distinction matters enormously when trying to extract lessons for other films.

How the campaign worked

Lionsgate and Universal described the overall spend as "unprecedented promotion and investments" in a Chinese press release, without publishing specific figures. What is public is the sequencing: a teaser in theaters before Now You See Me: Now You Don't in November 2025, a Grammy-timed trailer launch in February, an MTV-driven early access ticket drop in March, viral flash mobs in late March, and IMAX/Dolby early screenings on April 22 that sold out in major markets within hours. No single tactic is new. The architecture is what is worth studying.

The Grammys trailer launch

Lionsgate bought a TV commercial during the Grammy Awards on February 1 to flag the trailer dropping the following morning. The Grammys are music's most-watched night of the year. The audience most likely to be watching is the audience most likely to care about a Michael Jackson biopic. The placement telegraphed what kind of film this was culturally before a single frame of footage was released.

The trailer pulled 116.2 million views in 24 hours, the most in history for any music biopic and the biggest trailer launch in Lionsgate's history, surpassing Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour at 96.1 million. That number does work well beyond the view count. It tells exhibitors the film has genuine demand, influencing screen count. It tells advertisers the audience is massive, driving brand partnership interest. And it creates a self-reinforcing news cycle: the record becomes the story, and the story extends the trailer's reach organically.

The flash mobs

In late March, dancers appeared at crosswalks in New York and Los Angeles without announcement, performing Jackson's choreography at red lights. Videos went viral within hours. No Lionsgate branding was visible at first, which is the entire point. The tactic works because it feels discovered rather than distributed.

The deeper logic: Michael Jackson's art was always about performance in public space. His first televised moonwalk was on the Motown 25 anniversary special in 1983. The Thriller video was designed to be watched collectively. His concerts were civic events. A campaign that puts his choreography back into the street is not a stunt layered on top of the film. It is an expression of the subject, which makes it feel native in a way most experiential stunts do not. Whether the same tactic would have landed for the Elvis biopic in 2022 is worth asking. The answer is almost certainly not, and the reason is the gap in cultural ubiquity between the two artists.

The MTV blitz and early access mechanics

On March 10, MTV ran a promotional push fronted by Bill Bellamy tied to early access ticket sales opening the following morning. Tickets for premium-format screenings on April 22 went on sale at 6am PT on March 11 and sold out quickly in major IMAX markets, with AMC Lincoln Square in New York adding a second screening due to demand.

Fandango layered in an IMAX discount code (MICHAELIMAX) and a FanClub promotion offering two free tickets with a new subscription. Lionsgate also partnered with three HBCU marching bands, including Southern University's Human Jukebox, for a digital video called "Michael Celebrates: Legacy, Artistry, Culture" featuring the bands performing "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough." Briana McElroy, Lionsgate's head of digital marketing, described the initiative as honoring Jackson's legacy within communities where his music had a specific and lasting resonance.

The HBCU activation is worth isolating. It is community-specific in a way that broad national advertising is not. It does not try to reach everyone. It reaches a defined audience with a message that is personally meaningful to that audience, and then trusts that audience to carry it forward.

Casting the nephew

Jaafar Jackson, Michael's real nephew, plays the title role in his feature debut. This decision does significant marketing work that does not appear in the campaign budget. Every piece of press about Jaafar's casting is implicitly press about the film. The family angle generates a specific kind of attention hired talent cannot: the question of whether someone who knew the man can capture the myth. Antoine Fuqua described Jaafar as having "Michael's spirit," which moves the conversation from imitation to inheritance.

It also functions as a form of estate credibility, complicated by Paris Jackson's public criticism of the script as "sugar-coated." That controversy, rather than damaging the film, added genuine tension to the marketing that money cannot buy. The question of whether the film is truthful or sanitized became part of the cultural conversation, pulling in people who might otherwise not have been paying attention.

What this campaign cannot teach you

The honest version of this analysis has to include a warning. Every tactic described above is dependent on the scale of Jackson's cultural footprint. The Grammys placement works because his audience already watches the Grammys. The flash mobs work because his choreography is globally recognizable. The nephew casting works because the Jackson family is itself a cultural institution. The record-breaking trailer views work because there is a global fanbase primed to watch the moment anything is released.

None of these tactics are transferable in their current form to a film about a lesser-known artist. What is transferable is the underlying principle: find the marketing medium that is native to the subject's world, not borrowed from a generic campaign template. Jackson performed in public space. So did the campaign. If your artist made music that was discovered in small clubs, the native medium might be small clubs. If your artist built their following on early internet fan communities, the native medium might be online communities.

Movie marketing intel: This week in trends

BRAND PARTNERSHIPS 🤝 Wuthering Heights ran 49 brand partnerships and an $85M global marketing spend, and still came in below expectations (Deadline / Creative Boom) Warner Bros. spent an estimated $30–45M on domestic marketing for Wuthering Heights and $85M globally, with 49 brand partnerships spanning fashion, beauty, lifestyle and experiential, the most ever for an R-rated Warner Bros. release. Cornerstone deals with Bloomingdale's and Airbnb were supported by Charli xcx's soundtrack and 2,000 paid influencers globally. The film opened to $37.5M domestically against a $50–55M projection. The scale was impressive. It was also, by some measures, exactly the problem: when every cultural moment gets a checkout button, collaboration stops feeling special and starts feeling like furniture.

CONSUMER HABITS 📊 Frequent moviegoers have dropped from 39% of audiences to 17% since 2019 (Marketing Brew) S&P Global's latest consumer insights report found that while 70% of surveyed audiences saw at least one film in a theater over the past year, the share going monthly has collapsed by more than half. Cost is the primary driver. National CineMedia's chief data officer called 2026 "the year of fandom," arguing that IP-driven films with built-in communities are the most reliable draw in this environment. For campaigns targeting casual moviegoers rather than established fandoms, that number is a structural problem worth designing around.

This week's movie review: The Super Mario Galaxy Movie ★★ (2/5)
Bigger and louder than its predecessor but less certain of what it is trying to say. The Yoshi introduction is genuinely charming and Donald Glover brings warmth to a character the film then sidelines. The galaxy-hopping loses coherence fast, and the emotional throughline of the first film is buried under spectacle. The marketing campaign was more inventive than the film deserved.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading